ABSTRACT
Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs) are the leading cause of death in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1. They can result from premalignant neurofibromas, including neurofibromas with atypia and atypical neurofibromatous neoplasms of uncertain biologic potential. Some phenotypic characteristics have been described as associated with their development. The aim of this study was to outline our use of whole-body positron emission tomography with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose/magnetic resonance imaging in adults with neurofibromatosis type 1, especially in the screening of asymptomatic individuals with a higher risk of developing an MPNST, and to study its impact on neurofibroma classification (malignant vs premalignant) and MPNST staging over time. Individuals with neurofibromatosis type 1 who underwent a positron emission tomography with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose/magnetic resonance imaging between 2017 and 2021 were included, analyzing separately the screened population. Maximum standard uptake value and diffusion-weighted imaging were assessed. Biopsy/surgery confirmed the diagnosis. In all, 345 positron emission tomography with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose/magnetic resonance imaging were performed in 241 patients, including 149 asymptomatic (62%) but at-risk patients. Eight MPNSTs in 8 screened individuals (5%), 6 neurofibromas with atypia in 4 individuals (3%), and 29 atypical neurofibromatous neoplasms of uncertain biologic potential in 23 individuals (15%) were diagnosed. Over time, the proportion of grade 3 MPNST and the malignant/premalignant ratio in screened individuals significantly decreased (P = .03 and P < .001, respectively). This study emphasizes the diagnostic and screening performances of whole-body positron emission tomography with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose/magnetic resonance imaging in adults with neurofibromatosis type 1.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Cutaneous neurofibromas (cNF) are considered one of the highest burdens of neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). To date, no medical treatment can cure cNF or prevent their development. In that context, there is an urgent need to prepare and standardize the methodology of future trials targeting cNF. OBJECTIVES: The objective was to develop a core outcome domain set suitable for all clinical trials targeting NF1-associated cNF. METHODS: The validated approach of this work consisted of a three-phase methodology: (i) generating the domains [systematic literature review (SLR) and qualitative studies]; (ii) agreeing (three-round international e-Delphi consensus process and working groups); and (iii) voting. RESULTS: (i) The SLR and the qualitative studies (three types of focus groups and a French e-survey with 234 participants) resulted in a preliminary list of 31 candidate items and their corresponding definitions. (ii) A total of 229 individuals from 29 countries participated in the first round of the e-Delphi process: 71 patients, relatives or representatives (31.0%), 130 healthcare professionals (HCPs, 56.8%) and 28 researchers, representatives of a drug regulatory authority, industry or pharmaceutical company representatives or journal editors (12.2%). The overall participation rate was 74%. After round 2, five candidate items were excluded. Between rounds 2 and 3, international workshops were held to better understand the disagreements among stakeholders. This phase led to the identification of 19 items as outcome subdomains. (iii) The items were fused to create four outcome domains ('clinical assessment', 'daily life impact', 'patient satisfaction' and 'perception of health') and prioritized. The seven items that did not reach consensus were marked for the research agenda. The final core outcome domain set reached 100% of the votes of the steering committee members. CONCLUSIONS: Although numerous outcomes can be explored in studies related to cNF in NF1, the present study offers four outcome domains that should be reported in all trial studies, agreed on by international patients, relatives and representatives of patients; HCPs; researchers, representatives of drug regulatory authorities or pharmaceutical companies and journal editors. The next step will include the development of a set of core outcome measurement instruments to further standardize how these outcomes should be assessed.
Subject(s)
Neurofibroma , Neurofibromatosis 1 , Skin Neoplasms , Humans , Delphi Technique , Research DesignABSTRACT
Cutaneous neurofibromas (cNF) contribute to the impairment of QOL in individuals with neurofibromatosis 1. The cNF-Skindex, validated in a French population, specifically assesses the cNF-related QOL. In this study, we first defined severity strata using an anchoring approach on the basis of patient's burden. In total, 209 patients answered the anchor question and the cNF-Skindex. We tested the agreement among the three strata, generated by all potential couples of cut-off values of the cNF-Skindex and the three strata defined in the anchor question. The cut-off values 12 and 49 provided the highest Kappa value (κ = 0.685, 95% confidence interval = 0.604-0.765). Second, we validated the score and the strata in a United States population using the answers provided by 220 French and 148 United States adults. In the multivariable linear regression analysis, the country of origin was not a factor associated with the score (P = 0.297). The number of cNF along the different severity strata was similar between the French and the United States populations. In conclusion, stratification constitutes a powerful tool to better interpret the cNF-Skindex in daily practice and in clinical trials. This study validates its use in two populations that together constitute a large cohort of patients willing to participate in clinical research.
